Lost3 Foto & Bild | portrait, people Bilder auf fotocommunity
Lost3 Foto & Bild von Denise Woerdman ᐅ Das Foto jetzt kostenlos bei fotocommunity.de anschauen & bewerten. Entdecke hier weitere Bilder.
@ Ruud,
Well I am not new to the FC...and yes I agree you are one of the few providing his/her view to almost every picture in the voting and you deserve my respect for it! I also find your idea of constructive critique good, but it is definitely not the case up to now. What I see (with the rare exceptions I mentioned) are just comments like "+", "-", "sorry", "this is not gallery" and "skip"...which aren't very constructive I suppose. On the other hand I also believe that you cannot always rationally argue why you like or dislike a picture...for example in this case, do people like this kind of surreal image and this kind of humour, do they like set up pictures, or not (technically I believe there is not much negative to say...). Unless technical issues, but the personal feeling about a picture has nothing to do with constructive critique...so I am afraid that with this picture it will be all about personal feelings ;-)
Denise's series is harlarious and very creative. The colour balance is perfect considering a number of different light sources. Well done Denise - What's next?
@ Ruud: sorry but who are you to tell others what they should do and blaming them ? As I figure it out, some people here love to share their vote and others don't, and I respect both. I belong to the second category and I can assure you I am not only voting contra. So leave people alone with their approach and do not feel offended!
Robert Riley
22. Februar 2007, 21:32
Voting-Anmerkung
@Ruud. You know very well that I am very pro always make a comment. In the past you have defended those who don't. As a Channel manager you gave all sorts of excuses where nothing could be done!
At last I see some committment to getting members to make a comment!
That's were me Shetland ponies gone , been missing for weeks !!
Works when you look at the series pro+++
KasiaDesign
22. Februar 2007, 21:32
Voting-Anmerkung
Great humourous stuff. Shame it is so small. I like frames but this shot would be better without.
I'm going to give it a pro anyway for humour, composition, contrast and that little bit of cheek! Kathryn
Cees Kuijs
22. Februar 2007, 21:32
Voting-Anmerkung
@ Ruud, as you know, a lot of votes and a few comments, means the most of them are contra`s. But those sodds has no guts to say it straight in mens face. Feel sorry for them.
By the way, pro for me
Füge den folgenden Link per 'Einfügen' in das Kommentarfeld der gewünschten Konversation im Messenger ein, um dieses Bild in der Nachricht zu versenden.
Link kopiert...
Klicke bitte auf den Link und verwende die Tastenkombination "Strg C" [Win] bzw. "Cmd C" [Mac] um den Link zu kopieren.
Marc Erpelding 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
@ Ruud,Well I am not new to the FC...and yes I agree you are one of the few providing his/her view to almost every picture in the voting and you deserve my respect for it! I also find your idea of constructive critique good, but it is definitely not the case up to now. What I see (with the rare exceptions I mentioned) are just comments like "+", "-", "sorry", "this is not gallery" and "skip"...which aren't very constructive I suppose. On the other hand I also believe that you cannot always rationally argue why you like or dislike a picture...for example in this case, do people like this kind of surreal image and this kind of humour, do they like set up pictures, or not (technically I believe there is not much negative to say...). Unless technical issues, but the personal feeling about a picture has nothing to do with constructive critique...so I am afraid that with this picture it will be all about personal feelings ;-)
Dennis Veldman 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
the prints are without a frame, i have seen her working on these photographs ;)PRO!
Keep it up DeniSe!
Anastasiya Ivanova 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
+Patrick B. Parenteau 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
Denise's series is harlarious and very creative. The colour balance is perfect considering a number of different light sources. Well done Denise - What's next?Dragomir Vukovic 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
skipMarc Erpelding 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
@ Ruud: sorry but who are you to tell others what they should do and blaming them ? As I figure it out, some people here love to share their vote and others don't, and I respect both. I belong to the second category and I can assure you I am not only voting contra. So leave people alone with their approach and do not feel offended!Robert Riley 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
@Ruud. You know very well that I am very pro always make a comment. In the past you have defended those who don't. As a Channel manager you gave all sorts of excuses where nothing could be done!At last I see some committment to getting members to make a comment!
My comment is that this is .....Not gallery!
Sarah D. Kiefer 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
lots of imagination and i'm glad that dave donaldson knows where his pony is...safe and sound.cheers,
sarah k
oh...pro.
Abdul Khaliq 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
-Mark Johnston 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
oooooh the drama. I refuse to say what I vote.Dave Donaldson 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
That's were me Shetland ponies gone , been missing for weeks !!Works when you look at the series pro+++
KasiaDesign 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
Great humourous stuff. Shame it is so small. I like frames but this shot would be better without.I'm going to give it a pro anyway for humour, composition, contrast and that little bit of cheek! Kathryn
Véronique Soulier 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
skipCees Kuijs 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
@ Ruud, as you know, a lot of votes and a few comments, means the most of them are contra`s. But those sodds has no guts to say it straight in mens face. Feel sorry for them.By the way, pro for me
r o l f WENGENroth 22. Februar 2007, 21:32 Voting-Anmerkung
_