St Etienne Foto & Bild | europe, schweiz & liechtenstein, kt. waadt vaud Bilder auf fotocommunity
St Etienne Foto & Bild von nidrig ᐅ Das Foto jetzt kostenlos bei fotocommunity.de anschauen & bewerten. Entdecke hier weitere Bilder.
There are many ways to take a 360x360 view of a scenery. The wider the angle, the less shots are required. For instance, a 15mm requires 6 shots to cover the scene and a 16mm 8shots. A 24mm 12 shots and so on. The stitching process becomes more tedious with a great number of shots.
Also for indoor scenes with great exposure range, HDRI is almost mandatory. The minimum for HDRI is three different EV per shot.
Now do the math; 6 x 3 = 18 shots to cover the scenery in HDRI. And it's the minimum, as I explained before.
To make a long story short; the fisheye speeds the whole process.
indeed the foto is interesting.
but i cannot unterstand your way of working. may be that i am a very simple man. i mean in my position i had tried it not with a fish-eye.
Füge den folgenden Link per 'Einfügen' in das Kommentarfeld der gewünschten Konversation im Messenger ein, um dieses Bild in der Nachricht zu versenden.
Link kopiert...
Klicke bitte auf den Link und verwende die Tastenkombination "Strg C" [Win] bzw. "Cmd C" [Mac] um den Link zu kopieren.
Arthur Baumgartner 28. Dezember 2007, 18:37
Ein ausgezeichnetes Bild mit einer perfekten Bearbeitung und Bildaufbau!VG: Arthur
nidrig 27. Dezember 2007, 19:43
@ManfredThere are many ways to take a 360x360 view of a scenery. The wider the angle, the less shots are required. For instance, a 15mm requires 6 shots to cover the scene and a 16mm 8shots. A 24mm 12 shots and so on. The stitching process becomes more tedious with a great number of shots.
Also for indoor scenes with great exposure range, HDRI is almost mandatory. The minimum for HDRI is three different EV per shot.
Now do the math; 6 x 3 = 18 shots to cover the scenery in HDRI. And it's the minimum, as I explained before.
To make a long story short; the fisheye speeds the whole process.
Manfred Kampf 27. Dezember 2007, 18:31
indeed the foto is interesting.but i cannot unterstand your way of working. may be that i am a very simple man. i mean in my position i had tried it not with a fish-eye.